Skip to content

Conversation

quaff
Copy link
Contributor

@quaff quaff commented Oct 11, 2025

It should prefer JsonMapper over ObjectMapper for json.

JacksonJmxOperationResponseMapper and JacksonJsonParser remain using Jackson 3 ObjectMapper since it's part of public API, not sure we can break at this time.

Feel free to close it if it's not worthy.

@spring-projects-issues spring-projects-issues added the status: waiting-for-triage An issue we've not yet triaged label Oct 11, 2025
@wilkinsona wilkinsona added type: task A general task and removed status: waiting-for-triage An issue we've not yet triaged labels Oct 20, 2025
@wilkinsona wilkinsona added this to the 4.0.x milestone Oct 20, 2025
@wilkinsona wilkinsona added type: enhancement A general enhancement and removed type: task A general task labels Oct 20, 2025
@wilkinsona
Copy link
Member

JacksonJmxOperationResponseMapper and JacksonJsonParser remain using Jackson 3 ObjectMapper since it's part of public API, not sure we can break at this time.

We can change these now (before RC) as they've already changed from com.fasterxml.jackson to tools.jackson.

@wilkinsona wilkinsona added the for: merge-with-amendments Needs some changes when we merge label Oct 20, 2025
@quaff
Copy link
Contributor Author

quaff commented Oct 20, 2025

JacksonJmxOperationResponseMapper and JacksonJsonParser remain using Jackson 3 ObjectMapper since it's part of public API, not sure we can break at this time.

We can change these now (before RC) as they've already changed from com.fasterxml.jackson to tools.jackson.

OK, I will tackle it.

Signed-off-by: Yanming Zhou <zhouyanming@gmail.com>
@wilkinsona wilkinsona removed the for: merge-with-amendments Needs some changes when we merge label Oct 20, 2025
@snicoll snicoll self-assigned this Oct 20, 2025
@snicoll snicoll modified the milestones: 4.0.x, 4.0.0-RC1 Oct 20, 2025
snicoll pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 20, 2025
See gh-47503

Signed-off-by: Yanming Zhou <zhouyanming@gmail.com>
@snicoll snicoll closed this in 93039fb Oct 20, 2025
@snicoll
Copy link
Member

snicoll commented Oct 20, 2025

Good stuff, thanks again @quaff

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

type: enhancement A general enhancement

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants